From 9f1bb6c97d9685fbb4afa7c1897cbc73acf44a05 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2026 13:22:05 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] Add double pointer test to achieve 100% coverage for
 handleKeyValues

Add TestIssue873_DoublePointerUnmarshaler to test pointer-to-pointer
to Unmarshaler types. This covers the pointer dereferencing loop in
handleKeyValues, bringing its coverage from 88% to 100%.

Total coverage: 97.4%
---
 unmarshaler_test.go | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+)

diff --git a/unmarshaler_test.go b/unmarshaler_test.go
index 0795625..99207fa 100644
--- a/unmarshaler_test.go
+++ b/unmarshaler_test.go
@@ -4826,3 +4826,26 @@ another.nested.key = "value2"
 	assert.Equal(t, "value1", cfg.Section.Values["sub.key"])
 	assert.Equal(t, "value2", cfg.Section.Values["another.nested.key"])
 }
+
+// Test pointer to pointer to Unmarshaler (covers pointer dereferencing loop)
+func TestIssue873_DoublePointerUnmarshaler(t *testing.T) {
+	type Config struct {
+		Section **customTable873 `toml:"section"`
+	}
+
+	doc := `
+[section]
+key = "value"
+`
+
+	var cfg Config
+	err := toml.NewDecoder(bytes.NewReader([]byte(doc))).
+		EnableUnmarshalerInterface().
+		Decode(&cfg)
+
+	assert.NoError(t, err)
+	assert.True(t, cfg.Section != nil)
+	assert.True(t, *cfg.Section != nil)
+	assert.Equal(t, []string{"key"}, (*cfg.Section).Keys)
+	assert.Equal(t, "value", (*cfg.Section).Values["key"])
+}