ci: basic github action for coverage (#537)
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1,5 +1,19 @@
|
||||
**Issue:** add link to pelletier/go-toml issue here
|
||||
<!--
|
||||
|
||||
Thank you for your pull request!
|
||||
|
||||
Please read the Code changes section of the CONTRIBUTING.md file,
|
||||
and make sure you have followed the instructions.
|
||||
|
||||
https://github.com/pelletier/go-toml/blob/v2/CONTRIBUTING.md#code-changes
|
||||
|
||||
-->
|
||||
|
||||
Explanation of what this pull request does.
|
||||
|
||||
More detailed description of the decisions being made and the reasons why (if the patch is non-trivial).
|
||||
More detailed description of the decisions being made and the reasons why (if
|
||||
the patch is non-trivial).
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
Paste `benchstat` results here
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
|
||||
name: coverage
|
||||
on:
|
||||
push:
|
||||
branches:
|
||||
- v2
|
||||
pull_request:
|
||||
branches:
|
||||
- v2
|
||||
|
||||
jobs:
|
||||
report:
|
||||
runs-on: 'ubuntu-latest'
|
||||
name: report
|
||||
steps:
|
||||
- uses: actions/checkout@master
|
||||
with:
|
||||
fetch-depth: 0
|
||||
- name: Setup go
|
||||
uses: actions/setup-go@master
|
||||
with:
|
||||
go-version: 1.16
|
||||
- name: Run tests with coverage
|
||||
run: ./ci.sh coverage -d "${GITHUB_BASE_REF-HEAD}"
|
||||
+106
-58
@@ -1,74 +1,74 @@
|
||||
## Contributing
|
||||
# Contributing
|
||||
|
||||
Thank you for your interest in go-toml! We appreciate you considering
|
||||
contributing to go-toml!
|
||||
|
||||
The main goal is the project is to provide an easy-to-use TOML
|
||||
implementation for Go that gets the job done and gets out of your way –
|
||||
dealing with TOML is probably not the central piece of your project.
|
||||
The main goal is the project is to provide an easy-to-use and efficient TOML
|
||||
implementation for Go that gets the job done and gets out of your way – dealing
|
||||
with TOML is probably not the central piece of your project.
|
||||
|
||||
As the single maintainer of go-toml, time is scarce. All help, big or
|
||||
small, is more than welcomed!
|
||||
As the single maintainer of go-toml, time is scarce. All help, big or small, is
|
||||
more than welcomed!
|
||||
|
||||
### Ask questions
|
||||
## Ask questions
|
||||
|
||||
Any question you may have, somebody else might have it too. Always feel
|
||||
free to ask them on the [issues tracker][issues-tracker]. We will try to
|
||||
answer them as clearly and quickly as possible, time permitting.
|
||||
Any question you may have, somebody else might have it too. Always feel free to
|
||||
ask them on the [discussion board][discussions]. We will try to answer them as
|
||||
clearly and quickly as possible, time permitting.
|
||||
|
||||
Asking questions also helps us identify areas where the documentation needs
|
||||
improvement, or new features that weren't envisioned before. Sometimes, a
|
||||
seemingly innocent question leads to the fix of a bug. Don't hesitate and
|
||||
ask away!
|
||||
seemingly innocent question leads to the fix of a bug. Don't hesitate and ask
|
||||
away!
|
||||
|
||||
### Improve the documentation
|
||||
[discussions]: https://github.com/pelletier/go-toml/discussions
|
||||
|
||||
The best way to share your knowledge and experience with go-toml is to
|
||||
improve the documentation. Fix a typo, clarify an interface, add an
|
||||
example, anything goes!
|
||||
## Improve the documentation
|
||||
|
||||
The documentation is present in the [README][readme] and thorough the
|
||||
source code. On release, it gets updated on [pkg.go.dev][pkg.go.dev]. To make a
|
||||
change to the documentation, create a pull request with your proposed
|
||||
changes. For simple changes like that, the easiest way to go is probably
|
||||
the "Fork this project and edit the file" button on Github, displayed at
|
||||
the top right of the file. Unless it's a trivial change (for example a
|
||||
typo), provide a little bit of context in your pull request description or
|
||||
commit message.
|
||||
The best way to share your knowledge and experience with go-toml is to improve
|
||||
the documentation. Fix a typo, clarify an interface, add an example, anything
|
||||
goes!
|
||||
|
||||
### Report a bug
|
||||
The documentation is present in the [README][readme] and thorough the source
|
||||
code. On release, it gets updated on [pkg.go.dev][pkg.go.dev]. To make a change
|
||||
to the documentation, create a pull request with your proposed changes. For
|
||||
simple changes like that, the easiest way to go is probably the "Fork this
|
||||
project and edit the file" button on Github, displayed at the top right of the
|
||||
file. Unless it's a trivial change (for example a typo), provide a little bit of
|
||||
context in your pull request description or commit message.
|
||||
|
||||
Found a bug! Sorry to hear that :(. Help us and other track them down and
|
||||
fix by reporting it. [File a new bug report][bug-report] on the [issues
|
||||
tracker][issues-tracker]. The template should provide enough guidance on
|
||||
what to include. When in doubt: add more details! By reducing ambiguity and
|
||||
providing more information, it decreases back and forth and saves everyone
|
||||
time.
|
||||
## Report a bug
|
||||
|
||||
### Code changes
|
||||
Found a bug! Sorry to hear that :(. Help us and other track them down and fix by
|
||||
reporting it. [File a new bug report][bug-report] on the [issues
|
||||
tracker][issues-tracker]. The template should provide enough guidance on what to
|
||||
include. When in doubt: add more details! By reducing ambiguity and providing
|
||||
more information, it decreases back and forth and saves everyone time.
|
||||
|
||||
## Code changes
|
||||
|
||||
Want to contribute a patch? Very happy to hear that!
|
||||
|
||||
First, some high-level rules:
|
||||
|
||||
* A short proposal with some POC code is better than a lengthy piece of
|
||||
text with no code. Code speaks louder than words.
|
||||
* No backward-incompatible patch will be accepted unless discussed.
|
||||
Sometimes it's hard, and Go's lack of versioning by default does not
|
||||
help, but we try not to break people's programs unless we absolutely have
|
||||
* A short proposal with some POC code is better than a lengthy piece of text
|
||||
with no code. Code speaks louder than words. That being said, bigger changes
|
||||
should probably start with a [discussion][discussions].
|
||||
* No backward-incompatible patch will be accepted unless discussed. Sometimes
|
||||
it's hard, but we try not to break people's programs unless we absolutely have
|
||||
to.
|
||||
* If you are writing a new feature or extending an existing one, make sure
|
||||
to write some documentation.
|
||||
* If you are writing a new feature or extending an existing one, make sure to
|
||||
write some documentation.
|
||||
* Bug fixes need to be accompanied with regression tests.
|
||||
* New code needs to be tested.
|
||||
* Your commit messages need to explain why the change is needed, even if
|
||||
already included in the PR description.
|
||||
* Your commit messages need to explain why the change is needed, even if already
|
||||
included in the PR description.
|
||||
|
||||
It does sound like a lot, but those best practices are here to save time
|
||||
overall and continuously improve the quality of the project, which is
|
||||
something everyone benefits from.
|
||||
It does sound like a lot, but those best practices are here to save time overall
|
||||
and continuously improve the quality of the project, which is something everyone
|
||||
benefits from.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Get started
|
||||
### Get started
|
||||
|
||||
The fairly standard code contribution process looks like that:
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -76,42 +76,90 @@ The fairly standard code contribution process looks like that:
|
||||
2. Make your changes, commit on any branch you like.
|
||||
3. [Open up a pull request][pull-request]
|
||||
4. Review, potential ask for changes.
|
||||
5. Merge. You're in!
|
||||
5. Merge.
|
||||
|
||||
Feel free to ask for help! You can create draft pull requests to gather
|
||||
some early feedback!
|
||||
|
||||
#### Run the tests
|
||||
### Run the tests
|
||||
|
||||
You can run tests for go-toml using Go's test tool: `go test ./...`.
|
||||
When creating a pull requests, all tests will be ran on Linux on a few Go
|
||||
versions (Travis CI), and on Windows using the latest Go version
|
||||
(AppVeyor).
|
||||
You can run tests for go-toml using Go's test tool: `go test -race ./...`.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Style
|
||||
During the pull request process, all tests will be ran on Linux, Windows, and
|
||||
MacOS on the last two versions of Go.
|
||||
|
||||
Try to look around and follow the same format and structure as the rest of
|
||||
the code. We enforce using `go fmt` on the whole code base.
|
||||
However, given GitHub's new policy to _not_ run Actions on pull requests until a
|
||||
maintainer clicks on button, it is highly recommended that you run them locally
|
||||
as you make changes.
|
||||
|
||||
### Check coverage
|
||||
|
||||
We use `go tool cover` to compute test coverage. Most code editors have a way to
|
||||
run and display code coverage, but at the end of the day, we do this:
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
go test -covermode=atomic -coverprofile=coverage.out
|
||||
go tool cover -func=coverage.out
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
and verify that the overall percentage of tested code does not go down. This is
|
||||
a requirement. As a rule of thumb, all lines of code touched by your changes
|
||||
should be covered. On Unix you can use `./ci.sh coverage -d v2` to check if your
|
||||
code lowers the coverage.
|
||||
|
||||
### Verify performance
|
||||
|
||||
Go-toml aims to stay efficient. We rely on a set of scenarios executed with Go's
|
||||
builtin benchmark systems. Because of their noisy nature, containers provided by
|
||||
Github Actions cannot be reliably used for benchmarking. As a result, you are
|
||||
responsible for checking that your changes do not incur a performance penalty.
|
||||
You can run their following to execute benchmarks:
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
go test ./... -bench=. -count=10
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Benchmark results should be compared against each other with
|
||||
[benchstat][benchstat]. Typical flow looks like this:
|
||||
|
||||
1. On the `v2` branch, run `go test ./... -bench=. -count 10` and save output to
|
||||
a file (for example `old.txt`).
|
||||
2. Make some code changes.
|
||||
3. Run `go test ....` again, and save the output to an other file (for example
|
||||
`new.txt`).
|
||||
4. Run `benchstat old.txt new.txt` to check that time/op does not go up in any
|
||||
test.
|
||||
|
||||
It is highly encouraged to add the benchstat results to your pull request
|
||||
description. Pull requests that lower performance will receive more scrutiny.
|
||||
|
||||
[benchstat]: https://pkg.go.dev/golang.org/x/perf/cmd/benchstat
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
### Style
|
||||
|
||||
Try to look around and follow the same format and structure as the rest of the
|
||||
code. We enforce using `go fmt` on the whole code base.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### Maintainers-only
|
||||
## Maintainers-only
|
||||
|
||||
#### Merge pull request
|
||||
### Merge pull request
|
||||
|
||||
Checklist:
|
||||
|
||||
* Passing CI.
|
||||
* Does not introduce backward-incompatible changes (unless discussed).
|
||||
* Has relevant doc changes.
|
||||
* Has relevant unit tests.
|
||||
* Benchstat does not show performance regression.
|
||||
|
||||
1. Merge using "squash and merge".
|
||||
2. Make sure to edit the commit message to keep all the useful information
|
||||
nice and clean.
|
||||
3. Make sure the commit title is clear and contains the PR number (#123).
|
||||
|
||||
#### New release
|
||||
### New release
|
||||
|
||||
1. Go to [releases][releases]. Click on "X commits to master since this
|
||||
release".
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,107 @@
|
||||
#!/usr/bin/env bash
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
stderr() {
|
||||
echo "$@" 1>&2
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
usage() {
|
||||
b=$(basename "$0")
|
||||
echo $b: ERROR: "$@" 1>&2
|
||||
|
||||
cat 1>&2 <<EOF
|
||||
|
||||
DESCRIPTION
|
||||
|
||||
$(basename "$0") is the script to run continuous integration commands for
|
||||
go-toml on unix.
|
||||
|
||||
Requires Go and Git to be available in the PATH. Expects to be ran from the
|
||||
root of go-toml's Git repository.
|
||||
|
||||
USAGE
|
||||
|
||||
$b COMMAND [OPTIONS...]
|
||||
|
||||
COMMANDS
|
||||
|
||||
coverage [OPTIONS...] [BRANCH]
|
||||
|
||||
Generates code coverage.
|
||||
|
||||
ARGUMENTS
|
||||
|
||||
BRANCH Optional. Defines which Git branch to use when reporting
|
||||
coverage. Defaults to HEAD.
|
||||
|
||||
OPTIONS
|
||||
|
||||
-d Compare coverage of HEAD with the one of BRANCH. In this form,
|
||||
the BRANCH argument is required. Exit code is non-zero when
|
||||
coverage percentage decreased.
|
||||
EOF
|
||||
exit 1
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
cover() {
|
||||
branch="${1}"
|
||||
dir="$(mktemp -d)"
|
||||
|
||||
stderr "Executing coverage for ${branch} at ${dir}"
|
||||
|
||||
if [ "${branch}" = "HEAD" ]; then
|
||||
cp -r . "${dir}/"
|
||||
else
|
||||
git worktree add "$dir" "$branch"
|
||||
fi
|
||||
|
||||
pushd "$dir"
|
||||
go test -covermode=atomic -coverprofile=coverage.out ./...
|
||||
go tool cover -func=coverage.out
|
||||
popd
|
||||
|
||||
if [ "${branch}" != "HEAD" ]; then
|
||||
git worktree remove --force "$dir"
|
||||
fi
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
coverage() {
|
||||
case "$1" in
|
||||
-d)
|
||||
shift
|
||||
target="${1?Need to provide a target branch argument}"
|
||||
|
||||
output_dir="$(mktemp -d)"
|
||||
target_out="${output_dir}/target.txt"
|
||||
head_out="${output_dir}/head.txt"
|
||||
|
||||
cover "${target}" > "${target_out}"
|
||||
cover "HEAD" > "${head_out}"
|
||||
|
||||
cat "${target_out}"
|
||||
cat "${head_out}"
|
||||
|
||||
echo ""
|
||||
|
||||
target_pct="$(cat ${target_out} |sed -E 's/.*total.*\t([0-9.]+)%/\1/;t;d')"
|
||||
head_pct="$(cat ${head_out} |sed -E 's/.*total.*\t([0-9.]+)%/\1/;t;d')"
|
||||
echo "Results: ${target} ${target_pct}% HEAD ${head_pct}%"
|
||||
|
||||
delta_pct=$(echo "$head_pct - $target_pct" | bc -l)
|
||||
echo "Delta: ${delta_pct}"
|
||||
|
||||
if [[ $delta_pct = \-* ]]; then
|
||||
echo "Regression!";
|
||||
return 1
|
||||
fi
|
||||
return 0
|
||||
;;
|
||||
esac
|
||||
|
||||
cover "${1-HEAD}"
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
case "$1" in
|
||||
coverage) shift; coverage $@;;
|
||||
*) usage "bad argument $1";;
|
||||
esac
|
||||
+4
-5
@@ -838,15 +838,14 @@ B = "data"`,
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
desc: "mismatch types array of int to interface with non-slice",
|
||||
input: `A = [[42]]`,
|
||||
skip: true,
|
||||
input: `A = [42]`,
|
||||
gen: func() test {
|
||||
type S struct {
|
||||
A *string
|
||||
A string
|
||||
}
|
||||
return test{
|
||||
target: &S{},
|
||||
expected: &S{},
|
||||
target: &S{},
|
||||
err: true,
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user